Conducted Emissions Margin Calculator
Conducted Emissions Margin Calculator
How far under a conducted-emissions limit your measured or predicted spectrum sits, at every frequency you care about, with the worst one called out and the extra attenuation a stated design margin would need. MIL-STD-461G’s CE102 and all four CE101 limit curves are built in, read from the standard’s own figures, with their relaxation rules; any other limit, including the copyrighted ones, you enter as breakpoints.
Margin against a conducted-emissions limit
the MIL-STD-461G CE102 basic curve at a nominal 28 V source, against four predicted levels from an unfiltered 250 kHz converter: 250 kHz at 84, 500 kHz at 72, 1 MHz at 64 and 5 MHz at 52 dB above a microvolt, with a 6 dB design margin
A limit is a straight line between breakpoints on a log axis
margin(f) = limit(f) − level(f) positive means below the line
extra attenuation = max(0, design margin − worst margin)
V(µV) = 10dBµV/20 dBm = dBµV − 90 − 10·log10Z dBµA = dBµV − 20·log10Z
- x i
- the base-10 logarithm of breakpoint i’s frequency. Interpolating on a log axis is not a choice — it is how the limit is drawn, and interpolating linearly in frequency instead can be tens of decibels wrong in the middle of a decade
- s i
- the slope of segment i in decibels per decade. A flat segment has slope zero; the common falling segment of a conducted emissions limit has a slope of roughly minus 20
- margin
- positive when you are below the line. This page never calls a positive margin a pass, because a limit is met by the standard’s own method on the standard’s own setup
- Z
- the impedance the conversions are quoted against. 50 ohm is the receiver’s input impedance and gives the familiar 107 dB between dBµV and dBm, and 34 dB between dBµV and dBµA
Worked example
the MIL-STD-461G CE102 basic curve at a nominal 28 V source, against four predicted levels from an unfiltered 250 kHz converter: 250 kHz at 84, 500 kHz at 72, 1 MHz at 64 and 5 MHz at 52 dB above a microvolt, with a 6 dB design margin
The CE102 basic curve is 94 dBµV at 10 kHz, 60 dBµV at 500 kHz and flat at 60 dBµV to 10 MHz. Between the first two breakpoints that is a slope of -20.012 dB per decade, which is the drawn 20 dB per decade to within 0.02 dB — 94 − 20·log(50) is 60.0206, so the figure's own three numbers agree with each other
28 V is the table's basic-curve row, so the relaxation is 0 dB and the curve is used as drawn. There is no relaxation below 28 V either: a 12 V or 5 V bus gets this same curve
250 kHz sits on the sloping segment, 1.3979 decades above 10 kHz, so the limit there is 66.02 dBµV and a level of 84 is 17.98 dB ABOVE it
500 kHz is the knee itself at 60, so 72 is 12.00 dB above; 1 MHz and 5 MHz are both on the flat at 60, where 64 is 4.00 dB above and 52 is 8.00 dB below
The worst of the four is -18.0 dB at 250 kHz — above the limit, not below it
To reach a 6 dB design margin there the noise has to come down by 23.98 dB. That is the attenuation requirement a filter design starts from, and it is needed at the converter's fundamental
As a check on the units, 84 dB above 1 microvolt is 15.85 mV, which in 50 ohm is -22.99 dBm and 50.02 dB above 1 microamp. That last conversion is the one that matters when you switch to a CE101 curve, because CE101 is drawn in dBµA and the two units are 33.98 dB apart at this impedance
The five MIL-STD-461G limit sets this page carries
| Set | Applies to | The curve, in the figure’s own units |
|---|---|---|
| CE102, Figure CE102-1 (para 5.5.1) | 10 kHz to 10 MHz, all power leads including returns, every platform | 94 dBµV at 10 kHz, −20 dB/decade to 60 dBµV at 500 kHz, flat to 10 MHz. Relaxed by the figure’s table: 28 V basic, 115 V +6, 220 V +9, 270 V +10, 440 V +12 dB |
| CE101-1, Figure CE101-1 (para 5.4.1) | Surface ships and submarines, DC power, 30 Hz to 10 kHz | 95 dBµA from 30 Hz to 2.6 kHz, then straight to 76 dBµA at 10 kHz. Relaxed by 20·log(I/3) between 3 A and 185 A, by the printed 35 dB above |
| CE101-2, Figure CE101-2 | Surface ships and submarines, 60 Hz power; from 120 Hz | a (60 Hz, 120) → b (1.92 kHz, 90) → c (10 kHz, 76) dBµA under 1 kVA; d (120 Hz, 90) → b → c at 1 kVA and above |
| CE101-3, Figure CE101-3 | Surface ships and submarines, 400 Hz power; from 800 Hz | Curve #1, under 0.2 kVA or 2 A: 120 dBµA at 400 Hz falling 20 dB/decade to 92 dBµA at 10 kHz. Curve #2, at or above: flat 90 dBµA |
| CE101-4, Figure CE101-4 | Navy ASW aircraft and Army aircraft including flight line | Above 28 V: 110 dBµA to 1 kHz then to 90 at 10 kHz. 28 V or below: 100 dBµA to 1 kHz then to 80 at 10 kHz |
Which standard, and what may be reproduced
| Limit | Status | What this page does |
|---|---|---|
| MIL-STD-461G CE102, CE101 | US Department of Defense interface standard; a work of the US Government, distributed without charge | Reproduced. All five limit curves and both relaxation rules are built in, read from the standard’s figures and checked against the markers printed on them |
| RTCA DO-160 Section 21 | Copyrighted; sold by RTCA | Method and category letters named, values entered by you from your copy |
| CISPR 25, CISPR 32 | IEC documents, copyrighted | Method and class named, values entered by you from your copy |
| CISPR 17 | IEC document, copyrighted | Named as the source of the 50 ohm / 50 ohm insertion-loss convention only |
| A programme-specific limit | Your customer’s document | Exactly the same treatment: type the breakpoints |
The relaxation rules, exactly as the figures print them
| Figure | Condition | Relaxation |
|---|---|---|
| CE102-1 | Nominal EUT source voltage (AC and DC) 28 V | Basic curve |
| CE102-1 | 115 V | 6 dB |
| CE102-1 | 220 V | 9 dB |
| CE102-1 | 270 V | 10 dB |
| CE102-1 | 440 V | 12 dB |
| CE101-1 | Load current 3 A or less | Use the limit curve as shown |
| CE101-1 | Load current between 3 and 185 A | 20·log(I/3) |
| CE101-1 | Load current 185 A or more | 35 dB |
| CE101-2 and CE101-3 | Fundamental current — the load current at the power frequency — greater than 1 A | 20·log(fundamental current) |
| CE101-4 | None printed | — |
What moves a conducted-emissions margin, and by roughly how much
| Change | Direction | Typical size |
|---|---|---|
| Full load instead of light load | worse | 5 to 15 dB at the switching harmonics |
| Lowest input voltage instead of nominal | worse | a few dB; duty cycle and peak current both move |
| Ceramic filter capacitor at its rated voltage | worse | a Class II ceramic can lose half its capacitance, which is 6 dB |
| Cold start, before the ferrite warms up | varies | core permeability and capacitor ESR both move with temperature |
| A harness routed beside the switching stage | worse | unbounded; this is coupling, not conduction, and no filter fixes it |
| Peak detector instead of average | worse | several dB on broadband content; the standards specify which |
| Chassis bond made with a wire instead of a face | worse | the Y capacitors’ return path is the bond; a wire is an inductor |
Margin, not a verdict
A conducted-emissions limit is a line on a chart with decibels up the side and a logarithmic frequency axis along the bottom. Between its breakpoints it is straight, so the whole curve is described by a handful of corner points. This page carries five of them outright — MIL-STD-461G’s CE102 and all four of its CE101 figures, with the relaxation rules printed alongside them — and takes yours for anything else.
Where the built-in numbers came from. Not from memory, and not from a summary. Each figure’s page was rendered at 300 dpi and the drawn curve traced column by column against the gridlines, then checked against the markers the figures themselves print: the 94 and the 60 on CE102-1, the 95 and the 76 and the 2.6 on CE101-1, the a, b, c and d points and the 1.92 on CE101-2, the 92 on CE101-3, the two flat levels on CE101-4. Where the ink and the markers disagree the markers win, and the disagreements are recorded: the drawn knee on CE101-1 sits at 2.53 kHz against a printed 2.6, and both dashed markers on CE101-2 sit 1.4 per cent high. That is drafting error of two or three pixels, not a different limit, but it is the sort of thing that has to be looked at rather than assumed away.
Why the other limits are still typed in. RTCA’s DO-160 and the IEC’s CISPR 25 and CISPR 32 are sold documents, and reproducing their curves would be reproducing the part of them that has value. MIL-STD-461G is different: a US Department of Defense interface standard, a work of the US Government, distributed without charge. That is why one of these is built in and the others never will be. The breakpoint mode is not a second-best — it is the same arithmetic, and it is what a programme-specific limit needs too.
dBµV and dBµA are not interchangeable. CE102 is a voltage limit read at the LISN’s signal port. All four CE101 figures are current limits read from a probe clamped on the lead. The two are 20·log of the impedance apart — 34 dB in 50 ohm — so a dBµV reading put against a dBµA limit is not slightly wrong, it is wrong by more than any margin anyone argues about. Selecting a built-in set locks the unit control to that figure’s unit, and every conversion this page prints follows it, so the page cannot put one unit’s limit beside the other’s trace. What it cannot do is stop you typing the wrong numbers into the level boxes, which is why the level printed in the other unit is there below: if that number looks absurd, yours is in the wrong one.
What a positive margin is, and what it is not. It is the distance between a number you measured and a number on a figure. It is not a compliance statement. A limit is met by measuring the equipment under test the way the standard says — its setup, its ground plane, its bonding, its receiver bandwidths, its dwell times, its detector, at the operating points the test plan calls out — and a bench measurement with a spectrum analyser and a clip lead is not that. What a margin is good for is engineering: knowing how much attenuation to design for, knowing which frequency is driving the filter, and knowing whether the last change helped.
Applicability comes before the curve. CE102 applies to every platform in the standard’s matrix. CE101 applies only to surface ships, submarines, Army aircraft including flight line, and Navy aircraft that carry anti-submarine warfare equipment working between 30 Hz and 10 kHz — not to spacecraft, not to Air Force aircraft, not to ground installations. And for an AC application CE101 starts at the second harmonic of the power frequency, which is 120 Hz on the 60 Hz figure and 800 Hz on the 400 Hz one, even though both figures draw their upper curve from the fundamental. Picking the wrong figure is a bigger error than any interpolation on this page.
The 6 dB. Six decibels of design margin is what most programmes ask for and it appears in none of these standards as a requirement. It is there to absorb the things the measurement does not see: unit-to-unit spread, the receiver’s own uncertainty, capacitor derating with DC bias and temperature, the difference between your bench and the chamber, and the fact that a handful of spot frequencies is not a swept measurement. Space and launch programmes often specify more. It is a number from your specification, not from physics, which is why this page asks for it rather than assuming it.
Where the measurement is. Conducted emissions are measured on the leads entering the unit, through a LISN, one lead at a time. That is worth repeating because the noise a designer can see on an oscilloscope is usually on an internal rail, and the two are not the same measurement. A reader chasing ripple on a 3.3 V point-of-load rail very often has a problem at the 28 V bus input, and a filter on the 3.3 V rail does nothing about it. Once you have an attenuation requirement from this page, the filter designer turns it into components and the insertion-loss page says what those components actually deliver once their parasitics are in; where the spectrum comes from before hardware exists, the converter emissions estimator predicts the differential-mode part of it through the standard’s own LISN network.
Frequently asked questions
Where do the MIL-STD-461G curves on this page come from?
From the standard’s own figures — CE102-1 and CE101-1 through CE101-4 — read by rendering each figure at 300 dpi, calibrating on the printed gridlines and tracing the drawn curve, then checking the result against the numeric markers the figures themselves carry. MIL-STD-461G is a work of the US Government, distributed without charge, so its curves may lawfully be reproduced. DO-160 and CISPR 25 are copyrighted and are not, which is what the breakpoint mode is for.
How is the CE102 limit adjusted for the EUT source voltage?
By the table printed on Figure CE102-1 and by nothing else: 28 V is the basic curve, 115 V relaxes it by 6 dB, 220 V by 9 dB, 270 V by 10 dB and 440 V by 12 dB. There is no rule for voltages the table does not list, and there is NO RELAXATION BELOW 28 V — a 12 V, 5 V or 3.3 V source gets the basic curve unrelaxed. The five rows follow 10·log(V/28) to within 0.16 dB, which is worth noticing and is not a rule; it is certainly not 20·log(V/28), which would give 12.3 dB at 115 V where the table says 6.
Which CE101 figure applies to me?
CE101-1 for surface ships and submarines on DC power; CE101-2 for the same platforms on 60 Hz; CE101-3 for the same platforms on 400 Hz; CE101-4 for Army aircraft including flight line and for Navy aircraft that carry ASW equipment working between 30 Hz and 10 kHz. If your platform is not one of those, CE101 does not apply at all — it is absent for spacecraft, Air Force aircraft and ground installations. On an AC platform the requirement starts at the second harmonic of the power frequency.
What does a positive margin mean?
That the level you entered is below the limit, by that many decibels, at that frequency. It does not mean the equipment complies with anything. Compliance is a measurement made to the standard’s own method on the standard’s own setup, with its receiver bandwidths and detectors, at the operating points the test plan requires — and it is a test house that says so, not a calculator.
Why 6 dB of design margin?
Convention, not a rule from any of these standards. It covers unit-to-unit spread, measurement uncertainty, capacitor derating with DC bias and temperature, and the gap between a bench measurement and a chamber. Many space and launch programmes specify more than 6 dB, and some commercial work uses less. Take the number from your own specification.
How do I convert dBuV to dBm or to dBuA?
dBm = dBuV minus 90 minus 10 log of the impedance, which is dBuV minus 107 in 50 ohm. dBuA = dBuV minus 20 log of the impedance, which is dBuV minus 34 in 50 ohm. Both are on this page, computed against whatever impedance you enter. The second one matters because CE101 is a current limit and CE102 is a voltage limit, and comparing one against the other without the impedance is a 34 dB error. Note that the LISN’s own impedance is not 50 ohm at audio frequencies — it is about 5 ohm at 10 kHz — so 34 dB is a convention for quoting, not a conversion between the two requirements.
My limit has a slope. Do I enter it as a slope or as breakpoints?
As breakpoints. Give the frequency and level at each end of the sloping segment and the page interpolates a straight line between them on the logarithmic frequency axis, which is exactly how the limit is drawn. Interpolating linearly in frequency instead — which is what happens if you treat a log chart as a linear one — can be tens of decibels wrong in the middle of a decade.
Can I use this for radiated emissions limits too?
The arithmetic is identical: a piecewise-linear limit on a log axis, a measured level, a difference. What is not identical is everything around it. Radiated limits are in dBuV/m at a stated distance, they depend on antenna factors and chamber corrections you have to apply before you get a level to type in, and a margin against a radiated limit says nothing about the conducted one or the other way round. RE102 is deliberately not built into this page.
Related calculators
References
- MIL-STD-461G, Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment, 11 December 2015, superseding MIL-STD-461F. A US Department of Defense interface standard and a work of the US Government, distributed without charge. The limit sets on this page are taken from paragraph 5.4 (CE101: 5.4.1 applicability, 5.4.2 limits, 5.4.3 test procedure) and paragraph 5.5 (CE102: 5.5.1 applicability, 5.5.2 limits, 5.5.3 test procedure), with the curves read from Figures CE101-1, CE101-2, CE101-3, CE101-4 and CE102-1 and the relaxation rules from the annotation boxes printed inside those same figures. Table V, the requirement matrix, is the source of the applicability statements about which platforms CE101 and CE102 apply to.
- RTCA DO-160G, Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment, Section 21 Emission of Radio Frequency Energy. Copyrighted and sold by RTCA; its category letters and limit curves are not reproduced here. Cited for the method and the category structure only.
- CISPR 25, Vehicles, boats and internal combustion engines — Radio disturbance characteristics — Limits and methods of measurement for the protection of on-board receivers. An IEC document, copyrighted; its five severity classes and its voltage and current methods are named here, its limit values are not reproduced.
- CISPR 17 Edition 2.0, 2011-06, Methods of measurement of the suppression characteristics of passive EMC filtering devices. Defines the asymmetrical (common-mode), symmetrical (differential-mode) and unsymmetrical test circuits, with impedances referenced to 50 ohm; the first edition’s worst-case methods were deleted in this edition as no longer used in industry. Verified from the standard’s published preview; cited for the measurement convention, with no values reproduced.
- Ott HW. Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineering. Wiley, 2009. Chapter 13 Conducted Emissions: 13.1.1 Line Impedance Stabilization Network, 13.2.1 Common-Mode Emissions, 13.2.2 Differential-Mode Emissions. The chapter and section titles were checked against the author’s own published contents listing.
