Viscosity Converter (Dynamic and Kinematic)

Viscosity Converter (Dynamic and Kinematic)

Dynamic and kinematic viscosity are different quantities and ν = µ / ρ, so converting between them needs the fluid’s density — which is why water is 1.0016 cP and 1.0034 cSt and neither is exactly 1. Sixteen units plus Saybolt from the real ASTM D2161 equation, ISO 3448 and SAE J300 explained rather than conflated, and ASTM D341 for the one temperature conversion that can be done honestly.

Dynamic and kinematic viscosity

Viscosity + density → both families
The first nine are DYNAMIC viscosity, the next seven KINEMATIC. Converting between the two groups needs the density, which is the box below.
In the unit above. The default is water at 20 °C, in centipoise.
This is the number the conversion cannot be done without. Water at 20 °C is 998.21 kg/m³; a typical engine oil about 870; air at 20 °C about 1.204.
Off a lubricant data sheet. This is the number ISO VG grades are defined on. Used only for the grade and temperature block.
The other number off the same data sheet. This is what SAE J300’s second figure is measured at — and you need BOTH to move between them.
ASTM D341’s Walther relation, fitted to your two data points. Away from the two points it is an interpolation, and outside them an extrapolation.
A plot, not a circuit, and the best argument on this page. Three oils that are ALL ISO VG 46 — identical at 40 °C, identical grade, indistinguishable by the ISO test — drawn against temperature on ASTM D341's own log-log-log relation, which is a straight line in these coordinates. They meet exactly where ISO 3448 takes its measurement and are far apart where SAE J300 takes its two. That gap is the viscosity index, a property of the oil that neither grade number records, and it is why an ISO VG number cannot be converted to an SAE grade: the two standards do not measure at the same temperature. The three lines are the real D341 form for three viscosity indices, computed rather than sketched, and the key names them in the order they sit at the right-hand edge; your own oil's two numbers are below.
1.0016mPa·sExample

water at 20 °C: 1.0016 cP, at a density of 998.2066 kg/m³

Advertisement

ν = µ / ρ, and everything else follows from it

ν = µ / ρ  ·  1 cP = 1 mPa·s exactly  ·  1 cSt = 1 mm²/s exactly  ·  ISO VG = ν at 40 °C, ±10%  ·  log₁₀ log₁₀ Z = A − B log₁₀ T, Z = ν + 0.7 + exp(−1.47 − 1.84ν − 0.51ν²)  ·  SUS(100 °F) = 4.6324ν + 10⁵(1 + 0.03264ν) / (3930.2 + 262.7ν + 23.97ν² + 1.646ν³)
µ
dynamic viscosity, in Pa·s. What a rotational viscometer measures: stress per unit shear rate
ν
kinematic viscosity, in m²/s. What a capillary viscometer measures, because the fluid falls through under its own weight and its density is already in the answer
ρ
density. The quantity that makes this page necessary. Without it there is no conversion between µ and ν at all, and no search engine’s unit widget knows what fluid you have
1 cP = 1 mPa·s
exact, by the definition of the poise as 0.1 Pa·s. Likewise 1 cSt = 1 mm²/s exactly. This is why water at 20 °C is close to 1 in both, and why people conclude the two quantities are the same
A, B
ASTM D341’s Walther constants, fitted here to your own two data points. B is the slope of the viscosity temperature line — a low B is a high viscosity index. Two viscosities are the MINIMUM needed to move between 40 °C and 100 °C, which is why an ISO VG number alone cannot become an SAE grade
4.6324
the Saybolt asymptote at 100 °F, not a conversion factor. The full ASTM D2161 equation is what this page uses; the constant alone is 72% low at 2 cSt

Worked example

water at 20 °C: 1.0016 cP, at a density of 998.2066 kg/m³
A centipoise is a millipascal-second exactly, so 1.0016 cP is 1.0016 mPa·s — the conversion inside the dynamic family is a definition and needs nothing
Crossing to the kinematic family needs the density: ν = µ / ρ = 0.0010016 ÷ 998.2066 = 1.0034 × 10⁻⁶ m²/s, which is 1.0034 cSt
So water at 20 °C is 1.0016 cP and 1.0034 cSt. Close to 1 in both, exactly 1 in neither, and 0.180% apart from each other
The reason is arithmetic, not physics: dividing by a density of 0.9982 g/cm³ barely changes a number. Put an 870 kg/m³ engine oil in and the cSt figure is 15% above the cP figure; put air in, at 1.204 kg/m³, and it is 830 times larger
In Saybolt Universal seconds the same water is 29.12 SUS from the full ASTM D2161 equation, against 4.65 from the flat 4.6324 constant — the constant is an asymptote and this is the far end of the range where it fails

Two different quantities, and the bridge between them

Dynamic viscosity µKinematic viscosity ν
What it isResistance to shear: the stress needed per unit velocity gradientMomentum diffusivity: the same resistance divided by the inertia it has to move
SI unitPa·s, which is N·s/m² and also kg/(m·s)m²/s
CGS unitpoise, P = 0.1 Pa·sstokes, St = 1 cm²/s = 10⁻⁴ m²/s
The practical unitcentipoise, cP = 1 mPa·s EXACTLYcentistokes, cSt = 1 mm²/s EXACTLY
Imperial unitslbf·s/ft², and the reyn = lbf·s/in² = 6,894.757 Pa·s (a reyn is 144 lbf·s/ft²)ft²/s = 0.09290304 m²/s
How it is measuredA rotational viscometer: torque against speedA capillary tube: how long the fluid takes to fall through under its own weight — so gravity and density are already in the answer
To get the other oneDivide by densityMultiply by density
Water at 20 °C1.0016 cP1.0034 cSt
The last row is why people think the two are the same thing. Water at 20 °C is 1.0016 centipoise and 1.0034 centistokes: both within four tenths of a per cent of 1, and neither exactly 1. The coincidence is not a coincidence — the poise and the stokes were defined in CGS units, where water’s density is 0.998 g/cm³, so dividing by it barely changes the number. The moment the fluid is not water the two part company completely: for an engine oil at 870 kg/m³ the cSt figure is 15% larger than the cP figure, and for air, at 1.2 kg/m³, it is 830 times larger. There is no conversion between them without a density.

Reference values, with the density that connects them

Fluid°Cµ (cP)Density (kg/m³)ν (cSt)cSt ÷ cPSource
Air200.01811.20415.0569830.4958Engineering ToolBox
Water201.0016998.2071.00341.0018Engineering ToolBox; density from Tanaka 2001
Water1000.2816958.4500.29381.0434Engineering ToolBox / IAPWS-IF97
The sixth column is 1000 divided by the density, and it is the whole page in one number. For water it is very nearly 1, which is why the two units get muddled. For air it is over 800. Air is the case that makes it obvious: air is about fifty times LESS viscous than water dynamically and about fifteen times MORE viscous kinematically, because it has almost no mass to move. Ask which fluid is more viscous and the honest answer is “in which sense”. Water’s density here is Tanaka’s 2001 formula and its dynamic viscosity is Engineering ToolBox’s table, so the kinematic figure is this page’s own arithmetic from two independent sources rather than a third quoted number.

ISO 3448: the grade IS the viscosity, at 40 °C, ±10%

ISO VGMinimum at 40 °C (mm²/s)Maximum (mm²/s)10^(n/6) × 10Departure (%)
21.802.202.1547.72
32.703.303.1625.41
54.505.504.642-7.17
76.307.706.813-2.67
109.0011.0010.0000.00
1513.5016.5014.678-2.15
2219.8024.2021.544-2.07
3228.8035.2031.623-1.18
4641.4050.6046.4160.90
6861.2074.8068.1290.19
10090.00110.00100.0000.00
150135.00165.00146.780-2.15
220198.00242.00215.443-2.07
320288.00352.00316.228-1.18
460414.00506.00464.1590.90
680612.00748.00681.2920.19
1000900.001,100.001,000.0000.00
15001,350.001,650.001,467.799-2.15
There is nothing to convert here: an ISO viscosity grade is its own mid-point kinematic viscosity at 40 °C in mm²/s, and the limits are that number plus and minus ten per cent. The last two columns show the ladder is generated rather than chosen: it is six steps to the decade, 10^(n/6), and every grade from VG 10 up is that number rounded to within 2.2%. Below 10 the rounding to a single digit is coarser and the departure reaches 7.7%. Note also that adjacent bands never overlap — VG 32’s ceiling of 35.2 is below VG 46’s floor of 41.4 — so a measured 40 °C viscosity names exactly one grade or none.

SAE J300: a grade is a range with several criteria, not a number

GradeCold cranking, cP max (ASTM D5293)Pumping, cP max (ASTM D4684)Kinematic at 100 °C, min (mm²/s)… max (below)HTHS at 150 °C, min (mPa·s)
0W6200 at -35 °C60000 at -40 °C3.8——
5W6600 at -30 °C60000 at -35 °C3.8——
10W7000 at -25 °C60000 at -30 °C4.1——
15W7000 at -20 °C60000 at -25 °C5.6——
20W9500 at -15 °C60000 at -20 °C5.6——
25W13000 at -10 °C60000 at -15 °C9.3——
8——4.06.11.7
12——5.07.12.0
16——6.18.22.3
20——6.99.32.6
30——9.312.52.9
40——12.516.33.5 or 3.7
50——16.321.93.7
60——21.926.13.7
Read the two halves as two different kinds of specification. A WINTER grade — the number before the W — is not a viscosity at any temperature you will ever operate at: it is a pair of low-temperature limits, a cranking viscosity from a cold-cranking simulator and a pumping viscosity from a mini-rotary viscometer, at temperatures from −10 °C down to −40 °C. The pumping test is always five degrees colder than the cranking test and the pumping limit is the same 60,000 cP for every grade. The SECOND number is a kinematic viscosity band at 100 °C AND a high-shear-rate viscosity floor at 150 °C — two criteria, so the band alone does not determine the grade. Two consequences worth stating plainly. First, the three grades added since 2013 (8, 12, 16) OVERLAP their neighbours, where the original ladder abutted exactly: 7.0 mm²/s at 100 °C satisfies SAE 12, 16 and 20 all at once, and only the HTHS floors separate them. Second, an SAE 40’s HTHS floor depends on its winter grade — 3.5 for a 0W-40, 5W-40 or 10W-40 and 3.7 for a 15W-40, 20W-40, 25W-40 or a monograde 40 — so “SAE 40” is not one specification either. Figures read from two independent secondary sources and cross-checked against each other; J300 itself is copyrighted.

Three oils of the same ISO VG, and three different SAE answers

Oilν at 40 °Cν at 100 °CD341 slope BSAE hot grade(s) it satisfiesν at 20 °Cν at 150 °C
A lower-VI oil46.05.444.28108/12163.112.185
Your default oil46.06.803.684412/16133.842.853
A higher-VI oil46.08.503.133520112.243.766
All three are ISO VG 46 — identical at 40 °C, identical grade, indistinguishable by the ISO test. At 100 °C they are 5.4, 6.8 and 8.5 mm²/s and they satisfy different SAE bands. That is the proof that an ISO VG number cannot be converted to an SAE number: the two are measured sixty degrees apart and what happens in between is a property of the oil that neither number records. Every conversion chart on the web implies otherwise, usually by assuming a viscosity index of about 100 without saying so. With BOTH viscosities in hand — which any data sheet gives you — ASTM D341’s Walther relation does the job honestly, and that is what the temperature box on this page does. With only one, the conversion does not exist and this page does not offer it.

Saybolt: the constant is an asymptote, not a conversion

ν (cSt)SUS from the ASTM D2161 equationSUS in the standard’s own tableSUS from 4.6324 × ν aloneError of the flat constant (%)
2.032.6032.69.26-71.582
4.039.2039.218.53-52.729
10.058.8458.846.32-21.267
20.097.8297.892.65-5.290
50.0232.55233.0231.62-0.400
100.0463.46—463.24-0.048
500.02,316.21—2,316.20-0.000
The middle column is the check: the equation used here reproduces five rows of the standard’s own table to the digit printed, which is why it can be trusted where the table has no row. The last column is the finding. The single constant everyone quotes is an ASYMPTOTE — the equation tends to 4.6324 × ν only at high viscosity — and using it alone is 72% low at 2 cSt, 5.3% low at 20, 0.12% low at 75 and 0.05% low at 100. So it is fine for a heavy oil and useless for a light one, and the widely quoted figure of about 4.635 is not the standard’s number anyway. One more check worth doing: the standard’s own 210 °F constant of 4.664 comes out of its 100 °F constant through its own temperature correction, 4.6324 × (1 + 0.000061 × 110) = 4.6635, to 0.011%. The two published constants are one constant.

Two quantities, one density, and two standards measured sixty degrees apart

Dynamic and kinematic viscosity are different physical quantities, and ν = µ / ρ. That single equation is why this page exists and why a search engine’s unit widget cannot replace it: the conversion needs the fluid’s density, and nothing in the phrase “convert 40 cSt to cP” says what the fluid is. Dynamic viscosity is resistance to shear — stress per unit velocity gradient, in pascal-seconds. Kinematic viscosity is that divided by the density: a momentum diffusivity, in square metres per second, and the quantity that appears in the Reynolds number. They are measured by different instruments, which is most of why both exist. A rotational viscometer measures torque against speed and gives you µ. A capillary viscometer times a fluid falling through a tube under its own weight, so the density is already baked into what it measures, and gives you ν.

Inside each family the conversions are exact definitions. One centipoise is one millipascal-second, exactly, because the poise is defined as 0.1 Pa·s. One centistokes is one square millimetre per second, exactly. So water at 20 °C is 1.0016 cP and 1.0034 cSt — near 1 in both, exactly 1 in neither, and 0.18% apart. Verify that coincidence and it stops being mysterious: in these units you are dividing by water’s density expressed in grams per cubic centimetre, which is 0.9982, and dividing by something that close to 1 barely moves the number. The CGS units were built around water. That one accident is the reason people treat the two quantities as interchangeable, and it stops working the moment the fluid changes: for an engine oil at 870 kg/m³ the cSt number is 15% above the cP number, and for air, at 1.204, it is 830 times larger. Air is worth dwelling on. It is about fifty-five times LESS viscous than water dynamically and about fifteen times MORE viscous kinematically, because there is hardly any mass there to move. Both statements are true and they point opposite ways.

An SAE engine oil grade is not a number, it is a range with several criteria. The figure before the W is defined by low-temperature behaviour and by nothing else: a cranking viscosity on a cold-cranking simulator and a pumping viscosity on a mini-rotary viscometer, measured between −10 °C and −40 °C depending on the grade, with the pumping test always five degrees colder than the cranking one. The second figure is a kinematic viscosity band at 100 °C AND a high-shear-rate viscosity floor at 150 °C. Two criteria, so the band alone does not fix the grade — and since 2013 it fixes it even less, because the new SAE 8, 12 and 16 overlap their neighbours where the old ladder abutted exactly. A measured 7.0 mm²/s at 100 °C satisfies SAE 12, 16 and 20 simultaneously. An SAE 40 is not one specification either: its 150 °C floor is 3.5 mPa·s if it is a 0W-40, 5W-40 or 10W-40 and 3.7 otherwise.

ISO VG and SAE cannot be converted, and this is the page’s sharpest claim. ISO 3448 defines a viscosity grade as the kinematic viscosity at 40 °C, plus or minus ten per cent — so there is nothing to convert within it, the grade IS the viscosity. SAE’s second number is measured at 100 °C. Sixty degrees apart, and what happens in between is the oil’s viscosity index, a property neither number carries. Three oils can all be ISO VG 46, identical at 40 °C and indistinguishable by the ISO test, and be 5.4, 6.8 and 8.5 mm²/s at 100 °C, landing in different SAE bands. Every ISO-to-SAE chart on the web implies the conversion exists; what it has actually done is assume a viscosity index of about 100 without saying so. This page refuses the single-number conversion and offers the honest one instead: give it the 40 °C AND the 100 °C figures from a data sheet and it fits ASTM D341’s Walther relation — log log of viscosity against log of absolute temperature is a straight line — and reports the viscosity at whatever temperature you ask for, with the fitted slope shown.

Saybolt is not a constant either. Saybolt Universal seconds are still on American data sheets, and the conversion everyone quotes — divide by about 4.635 — is an asymptote rather than a factor. ASTM D2161 publishes a full equation, and the constant alone is 72% low at 2 cSt, 5.3% low at 20 cSt, and inside a tenth of a per cent only above about 80 cSt. This page uses the equation in both directions, inverting it numerically for Saybolt input, and it reproduces five rows of the standard’s own table to the digit printed. The standard’s number is 4.6324, not 4.635; and its 210 °F constant of 4.664 turns out to be the 100 °F one put through its own temperature correction, which is a satisfying thing to be able to check. For the density this page cannot do without, see the density and specific gravity converter, which also handles API gravity if that is what your data sheet gives you; for surface finish and hardness on the same components, the surface roughness converter and the hardness scale converter.

Advertisement

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between dynamic and kinematic viscosity?

They are different physical quantities, not different units for one. Dynamic viscosity µ is the resistance to shear: the stress needed per unit velocity gradient, in Pa·s. Kinematic viscosity ν is that resistance divided by the fluid’s density, in m²/s — a momentum diffusivity, and the thing that appears in the Reynolds number. ν = µ / ρ. The reason the two get muddled is that they are measured by different instruments — a rotational viscometer gives you µ, a capillary tube gives you ν because the fluid falls through under its own weight — and both have a practical unit whose value is near 1 for water.

Why is water 1 cP and also 1 cSt?

It is neither, quite. At 20 °C water is 1.0016 cP and 1.0034 cSt, which are 0.18% apart. The near-coincidence is because 1 cP = 1 mPa·s exactly and 1 cSt = 1 mm²/s exactly, and ν = µ / ρ — so in these units you are dividing by water’s density expressed in g/cm³, which is 0.9982. Dividing by something that close to 1 barely moves the number. The CGS units were chosen around water, and that is the whole of it. It is also the single most misleading fact in this subject, because it makes the two quantities look interchangeable when they only nearly are, and only for water.

Can I convert an ISO VG grade to an SAE grade?

Not from the grade alone, and this page will not pretend otherwise. ISO 3448 defines a VG number as the kinematic viscosity at 40 °C; SAE J300’s second number is a kinematic viscosity band at 100 °C plus a high-shear-rate limit at 150 °C. Sixty degrees apart, and how steeply an oil thins in between is a property of the oil — its viscosity index — that neither number records. Three oils that are all ISO VG 46 can be 5.4, 6.8 and 8.5 mm²/s at 100 °C and fall in different SAE bands. If you have BOTH the 40 °C and the 100 °C figures, which any data sheet gives, ASTM D341’s Walther relation interpolates honestly and this page does it. With one number, the conversion does not exist.

What does the number before the W actually mean?

Not a viscosity at any temperature you drive at. SAE J300 defines a winter grade by two low-temperature limits: a cranking viscosity measured on a cold-cranking simulator (ASTM D5293) and a pumping viscosity on a mini-rotary viscometer (ASTM D4684), at temperatures from −10 °C for a 25W down to −35 °C and −40 °C for a 0W. The grade is the coldest temperature at which the oil passes. The pumping test is always five degrees colder than the cranking test — the engine has to be able to move the oil before it can turn over in it — and the pumping limit is the same 60,000 cP for every grade.

Is SAE 40 one specification?

No, which is a good illustration of why a grade is a range with several criteria rather than a number. Every SAE 40 has the same kinematic band at 100 °C, 12.5 to below 16.3 mm²/s, but the high-shear-rate floor at 150 °C differs: 3.5 mPa·s for a 0W-40, 5W-40 or 10W-40 and 3.7 for a 15W-40, 20W-40, 25W-40 or a monograde. And the three grades added to J300 since 2013 — 8, 12 and 16 — overlap their neighbours, where the original ladder abutted exactly. A measured 7.0 mm²/s at 100 °C satisfies SAE 12, 16 and 20 all at once, and only the HTHS limits separate them.

Is Saybolt just centistokes times 4.635?

No. That constant is an asymptote that the real relation only approaches at high viscosity, and the standard’s own figure is 4.6324 rather than 4.635. ASTM D2161 gives a full equation, and the flat constant alone is 72% low at 2 cSt, 5.3% low at 20 cSt, and only within a tenth of a per cent above about 80 cSt. This page uses the equation, which reproduces five rows of the standard’s own table to the digit printed. A nice consistency check falls out of it: the standard’s 210 °F constant of 4.664 is its 100 °F constant put through its own temperature correction, 4.6324 × (1 + 0.000061 × 110), to within 0.011%.

Which is more viscous, air or water?

It depends which viscosity you mean, and air is the example that makes the question unavoidable. Dynamically, air at 20 °C is 0.01813 cP against water’s 1.0016 — about fifty-five times less viscous. Kinematically, air is about 15 cSt against water’s 1.003 — about fifteen times MORE viscous, because there is almost no mass there to move. Both statements are true and they point opposite ways. That is not a paradox; it is what it means for µ and ν to be different quantities.

How do I get the density if I only have a viscosity?

From the fluid, not from the viscosity — they are independent properties and there is no relation between them. A lubricant data sheet gives density at 15 °C or 20 °C; for water use the temperature-dependent value (Tanaka’s formula, which the density and specific gravity converter implements); for a petroleum product you may have an API gravity instead, which that page converts. Remember that density is itself temperature-dependent, so a viscosity measured at 100 °C needs a density at 100 °C, and using a 15 °C density there will be a few per cent out.

Related calculators

References

  1. ASTM D2161, Standard Practice for Conversion of Kinematic Viscosity to Saybolt Universal Viscosity or to Saybolt Furol Viscosity. The current edition is behind a paywall and was not fetched. The equation used here was read from the archived 1966 edition and then VERIFIED against five of that edition’s own Table 1 rows, which it reproduces to the digit printed: 2.0 cSt → 32.6 SUS, 4.0 → 39.2, 10 → 58.8, 20 → 97.8, 50 → 233. The temperature correction is U(t) = U(100 °F) × (1 + 0.000061(t − 100)), and the standard’s own 210 °F constant of 4.664 is recovered from its 100 °F constant of 4.6324 by exactly that factor, to 0.011%.
  2. ISO 3448, Industrial liquid lubricants — ISO viscosity classification. Cited by number; the standard was not fetched. What was checked instead: the grade number IS the mid-point kinematic viscosity at 40 °C in mm²/s, the limits are that ±10%, and the eighteen grades from VG 10 upward are 10^(n/6) rounded — six steps to the decade — to within 2.2%. Grade list cross-read from Chevron Marine Products’ viscosity-class technical bulletin.
  3. SAE J300, Engine Oil Viscosity Classification. An SAE standard and copyrighted; it was not fetched. The band limits used here were read from two independent secondary sources and cross-checked against each other: the Wikipedia article on SAE J300 (2021 revision) and Lubrita’s news item on the addition of SAE 8 and 12. Both give SAE 8 as 4.0 to below 6.1 mm²/s at 100 °C with a 1.7 mPa·s HTHS floor and SAE 12 as 5.0 to below 7.1 with 2.0, and they agree to the digit.
  4. ASTM D341, Standard Practice for Viscosity-Temperature Equations and Charts for Liquid Petroleum or Hydrocarbon Products. Cited by number; not fetched. The form used — log₁₀ log₁₀ Z = A − B log₁₀ T with T in kelvin and Z = ν + 0.7 + exp(−1.47 − 1.84ν − 0.51ν²) — was read from Technical Toolboxes’ knowledge-base article on the practice, and is checked here by round-tripping: fitted to a pair of measured viscosities it reproduces both to a part in 10⁶.
  5. Engineering ToolBox. Water — Dynamic and Kinematic Viscosity at Various Temperatures and Pressures. Water’s dynamic viscosity at 20 °C is 1.0016 mPa·s. Combined with Tanaka’s density that gives 1.0034 mm²/s, so water at 20 °C is 1.0016 cP and 1.0034 cSt — near 1 in both, and exactly 1 in neither.
  6. Tanaka M, Girard G, Davis R, Peuto A, Bignell N. Recommended table for the density of water between 0 °C and 40 °C based on recent experimental reports. Metrologia 38 (2001) 301–309. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/38/4/3. The density used in every dynamic-to-kinematic conversion of water on this page.