Ice Hockey Standings Points Calculator

Ice Hockey Standings Points Calculator

Ice hockey’s two points schemes on one set of results. The NHL pays 2 for a win and 1 for an overtime loss, so an overtime game hands out three points and a regulation game two; the IIHF pays 3-2-1-0 and hands out three in every game.

Standings points

NHL ⇄ IIHF
Games won inside the three periods: two points under the NHL and three under the IIHF, the one result the schemes disagree about. The NHL publishes it as regulationWins and uses it as a tie-break.
Both schemes pay two for either, so they share one box. From the NHL’s published standings this is wins minus regulationWins.
The loser point, and the whole oddity of the NHL table. One point under both schemes. The NHL calls it otLosses and its season metadata records “pointForOTlossInUse”: true for 2025-26 and 2026-27.
No points under either scheme. Entered so games played can be checked against the fixture list, which is the fastest way to catch a miscounted line.
Neither is hard-coded and the other total is always printed underneath. The NHL is the default because most readers of an English page are looking at an NHL table; for a World Championship, switch it.
112pointsExample

38 regulation wins, 12 wins in overtime or a shootout, 12 overtime or shootout losses, 20 regulation losses, NHL scheme — the Dallas Stars’ 2025-26 NHL regular season

Advertisement

Formula

NHL: 2W + 1(OT/SO loss) IIHF: 3(regulation win) + 2(OT/SO win) + 1(OT/SO loss)
the NHL’s two points for a win
a win is two points however it arrives and a loss in overtime or a shootout is one. The league’s standings metadata records “pointForOTlossInUse”: true for 2025-26 and 2026-27 and “tiesInUse”: false, and its final 2025-26 standings satisfy points = 2 × wins + otLosses for every team checked
the IIHF’s three points for a regulation win
Article 216 of the IIHF World Championships Event Code: “Three (3) points for the winning team at the conclusion of the regulation time”; “One (1) point for both playing teams at the conclusion of the regulation time if the game is tied”; “One (1) additional point earned for the team winning the game in a 5-minute overtime period” or the shootout; “Zero (0) points for the team losing the game in the regulation time”. Article 196 of the World Women’s and World Junior Event Code says the same, and was read separately so the scheme does not rest on one article

Worked example

38 regulation wins, 12 wins in overtime or a shootout, 12 overtime or shootout losses, 20 regulation losses, NHL scheme — the Dallas Stars' 2025-26 NHL regular season
38 + 12 + 12 + 20 = 82 games, a full NHL season. NHL scheme: 2 × (38 + 12) = 100 from the wins plus 12 loser points = 112 points, exactly the total the NHL publishes for Dallas in its final 2025-26 standings
IIHF scheme on the same results: 3 × 38 + 2 × 12 + 12 = 150 points
Now the divergence. Buffalo's line was 42, 8, 9, 23: 2 × 50 + 9 = 109 NHL points, three BEHIND Dallas, and 3 × 42 + 2 × 8 + 9 = 151 IIHF points, one AHEAD. Two real teams on their real published results, reversed — because Buffalo won four more games in regulation, worth nothing extra under the NHL's two for any win and four under the IIHF's three
The asymmetry, pinned: under the NHL a regulation game distributes 2 + 0 = 2 points and an overtime game 2 + 1 = 3; under the IIHF it is 3 + 0 and 2 + 1, three either way
Set the regulation wins to 0 and the two totals become identical — the degenerate case, and no real season
Advertisement

Four teams’ 2025-26 NHL results under both schemes

Team, 2025-26 final standingsReg WOT/SO WOT/SO LReg LNHL pointsIIHF points
Colorado Avalanche4871116121169
Carolina Hurricanes3914722113152
Dallas Stars38121220112150
Buffalo Sabres428923109151
The four result counts are the NHL’s own final 2025-26 standings, overtime and shootout combined because neither scheme separates them; the NHL points column is the league’s published total and the IIHF column is this page’s arithmetic. The NHL orders these four Colorado, Carolina, Dallas, Buffalo; the IIHF orders them Colorado, Carolina, BUFFALO, Dallas — Buffalo won four more games inside sixty minutes and the NHL pays nothing extra for that.

What one game is worth, and what it hands out in total

How the game endedNHL, winnerNHL, loserNHL totalIIHF, winnerIIHF, loserIIHF total
Decided in regulation202303
Decided in overtime213213
Decided in a shootout213213
The NHL total column is the oddity: a league’s points total is not fixed by its number of games, so a season with more overtime inflates every table. The IIHF column is three in every row by design. Sources: IIHF Event Code Articles 216 and 196 for the IIHF rows, the NHL’s standings metadata and final 2025-26 standings for the NHL rows.

Three points in a game that goes to overtime, two in one that does not

This page is about ice hockey — the game played with a puck on an ice rink, whose international rules are the IIHF’s and whose North American professional rules are the NHL’s own. It is not about field hockey, the eleven-a-side game on a turf pitch governed by the FIH, whose periods, set pieces and statistical definitions are different; this site keeps the two sports in separate sections for that reason.

There is no single ice hockey points scheme, and the two biggest bodies do not agree. The NHL awards two points for a win, one for a loss in overtime or a shootout and none for a loss in regulation, so an overtime game hands out THREE points in total and a regulation game only two. The IIHF awards three for a regulation win, two for an overtime or shootout win, one for an overtime or shootout loss and none for a regulation loss — three points in every game, however it ends. Neither is hard-coded here; both are computed on the same results, and on real 2025-26 results they order the table differently.

Start with the NHL’s asymmetry, because it is the strangest thing in any major league’s table. A win is two points and a loss in overtime or a shootout is one, so a game settled inside sixty minutes puts TWO points into the standings and a game that goes past them puts THREE. The total in an NHL table is therefore not fixed by the number of games played — it depends on how many went to overtime, which is nobody’s achievement. That is why the league publishes regulationWins as a standings field of its own and uses it to break ties: a side that wins inside sixty minutes denies its opponent a point and a side that wins in overtime does not, so the two kinds of win are worth the same to the winner and not to the table.

The IIHF’s answer is three points for a regulation win, two for an overtime or shootout win, one for an overtime or shootout loss and none for a regulation loss. Article 216 of its World Championships Event Code gives three for a win “at the conclusion of the regulation time”, one each if the game is tied then, and “One (1) additional point earned for the team winning the game in a 5-minute overtime period” or the shootout. Add that up and every game distributes exactly three points however it ends, which removes the inflation. Article 196 of the World Women’s and World Junior Event Code says the same in the same words, and was read separately so the scheme here does not rest on a single article.

On real results the two schemes disagree about who finished where, and it takes no contrived example to show it: the table below runs four lines from the NHL’s own final 2025-26 standings through both, and Dallas and Buffalo swap places. The gap between a team’s two totals is exactly its number of regulation wins, which is the compact way to see that regulation wins are the only result the schemes value differently.

A note on how the points scheme is sourced. The NHL serves its Official Rules as a PDF, and the text extraction available here stops a quarter of the way in, before Rule 84, “Overtime” — the rule that would state the points in its own words. Nothing on this page quotes it. Instead the scheme is taken from two things the league does publish in machine-readable form: its standings metadata, which records “pointForOTlossInUse”: true for 2025-26 and 2026-27, and its final standings, whose points column the arithmetic below reproduces exactly for every team checked.

Two cautions before publishing a table built from this. Neither scheme is universal — a national, junior or women’s league may use either or something else, and its own regulations are the only authority. And overtime is not one thing: IIHF Rule 84.1 gives up to five sudden-death minutes three-on-three in the round robin, Rule 84.5 ten in playoff and medal games, and Rule 84.6 repeated periods in the gold medal game until somebody scores. For what those minutes do to a goaltender’s numbers see goals against average, and for the penalties inside them see the special-teams page.

Frequently asked questions

How many points is a win worth in the NHL?

Two, in regulation, overtime or a shootout alike. A loss in overtime or a shootout is one and a regulation loss none. The league’s standings metadata records “pointForOTlossInUse”: true for 2025-26 and 2026-27, and its published points column equals 2 × wins + overtime losses for every team checked.

Why does an NHL overtime game hand out three points?

Because the winner takes two and the loser keeps one, where a regulation game gives two and nothing. The total in an NHL table therefore depends on how many games went past sixty minutes, which is not a property of any team — and that is why regulation wins are published separately and used as a tie-break.

What points system does the IIHF use?

Three for a regulation win, two for an overtime or shootout win, one for an overtime or shootout loss, none for a regulation loss — Article 216 of the World Championships Event Code. Every game distributes exactly three points.

Do the two schemes ever produce different standings?

Yes. Dallas finished three points ahead of Buffalo under the NHL’s scheme in 2025-26, 112 to 109, and one point behind it under the IIHF’s, 150 to 151.

Is this the same as a field hockey points scheme?

No. The FIH’s General Tournament Regulations pay three for a win and one for any draw in pool play, while the FIH Pro League pays two to a shoot-out winner and one to its loser. Different sport, different body, different numbers, and a field hockey table cannot be read with an ice hockey scheme.

Related calculators

References

  1. National Hockey League. Final regular-season standings, 2025-26, as JSON at api-web.nhle.com/v1/standings/2026-04-17 (read 12 Oct 2026), every team at 82 games played. How the points scheme here is checked against the league’s own published totals rather than against a rule that could not be read.
  2. National Hockey League. Standings season metadata, as JSON at api-web.nhle.com/v1/standings-season (read 12 Oct 2026). For 20252026 and 20262027: “pointForOTlossInUse”: true, “regulationWinsInUse”: true, “tiesInUse”: false — the league’s own machine-readable statement that the loser point is in force.
  3. International Ice Hockey Federation. Event Code — IIHF World Championships, Article 216, “Allocation of points” (read 12 Oct 2026 at test.rulebook.iihf.com). Three points for a win at the conclusion of regulation time; one for both teams if tied then; one additional point for the winner of a five-minute overtime or the penalty-shot shootout; zero for a regulation loss.
  4. International Ice Hockey Federation. Event Code — IIHF World Women’s and World Junior Championships, Article 196, “Allocation of points” (read 12 Oct 2026). A second, independent IIHF document, read so the scheme does not rest on one article: wording and figures match Article 216’s.
  5. International Ice Hockey Federation. IIHF Rule Book 2026/27. Zurich: IIHF; 2026. Served article by article at test.rulebook.iihf.com (read 12 Oct 2026; rulebook.iihf.com is robots-disallowed). Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 77.1 to 77.3 and 84.1 to 84.6. Rule 1.2’s dimensions are in the rule text, not only in the Appendix VI infographic, which was checked.
  6. National Hockey League. 2024-2025 Official Rules. New York: NHL; 2024. PDF at media.nhl.com. Rules 1.2, 16.1, 18.1, 20.1 and 23 are quoted from the extracted text, which stops at 128,456 characters partway through Rule 19.4 — so Rule 77 (p.118), Rule 84 (p.129) and Rule 86 (p.134) could not be read and are quoted nowhere in this batch; their page numbers come from the book’s own contents.