Coffee Brew Ratio Calculator

Coffee Brew Ratio Calculator

Dose, water and yield for pour-over, drip, French press, immersion, AeroPress, cold brew and espresso — with the water the wet grounds keep taken out, so a 1:16 brew is shown as the 1:14 drink it actually is. Espresso handled as its own thing, because its ratio is dose to liquid out.

Coffee brew ratio

Dose, ratio → water and yield
This sets nothing by itself — it tells you which published ratio band to aim at, and whether the ratio means water in or liquid out.
In whatever unit the box beside this says. If you are entering a volume of dry grounds, read the warning below the answer first.
A millilitre of water is not a gram. Cold from the tap it is 0.99821 g/mL; just off the boil it is 0.95835. Measure the jug cold and the difference is 0.2%; measure it hot and it is 4%.
Published bands: pour-over 13-16 and French press 10-16 (National Coffee Association), the SCA Golden Cup drip ratio 18.2 (55 g per kg of water), cold brew concentrate 4-5. For espresso this is liquid OUT per part dose, usually 1.5 to 3.
About 2 for drip and a plunger, about 3 for a full immersion in a jug (Barista Hustle). An espresso puck holds about 2. This is the number that decides how much coffee you actually get.
The National Coffee Association says water equal to double the dose, left 30-45 seconds until the grounds stop bubbling. Bloom water is part of the total, not extra.
Leave it at 1.35 for a typical North American filter brew, or set 0 to hide the extraction rows. The SCA’s target band is 1.15-1.55%.
Not a circuit: a mass balance drawn to one scale. The middle bar is the water you pour, and it is held at a constant length so that everything else reads as a PROPORTION of it. The top bar is the dry coffee at the same scale — at 1:16 it is a sixteenth of the water. The bottom row is the same water after brewing, split where the wet grounds keep their share: the left part is what reaches the cup and the right part is what stays in the bed. Raise the retained ratio and the split moves left; widen the ratio and the coffee bar shrinks. This is the whole reason a 1:16 brew is a 1:14 drink.
288.0gExample

18 g of coffee brewed as a pour-over at 1:16, grounds keeping 2 g/g

Advertisement

The mass balance, which is the whole page

water in = ratio × dose  ·  liquid the bed keeps = LRR × dose  ·  coffee in the cup = water in − LRR × dose  ·  so the ratio you drink = ratio you set − LRR. For espresso instead: liquid out = ratio × dose, and water in = liquid out + LRR × dose.
dose
dry ground coffee, by mass. Every ratio on this page is a mass ratio; a spoon is not a mass
ratio
for every method except espresso, parts of water IN per part of dry coffee. For espresso, parts of liquid OUT per part of dry dose — a different quantity with the same notation
LRR
liquid-retained ratio: grams of brew liquid the wet bed holds per gram of dry coffee. About 2 for drip and a plunger, about 3 for a full immersion, about 2 for an espresso puck
water density
0.99821 g/mL at 20 °C, 0.95835 at 100 °C. A volume of water is only a mass once you say how hot it is
extraction yield
the share of the dry dose that ends up dissolved. The brewing control chart computes it from the beverage alone and so leaves out the solids in the wet bed

Worked example

18 g of coffee brewed as a pour-over at 1:16, grounds keeping 2 g/g
Water in = 16 × 18 = 288 g. That is the headline, and it is the number you set the scale to
The wet bed keeps 2 × 18 = 36 g of it
So the coffee in the cup is 288 − 36 = 252 g, not 288 — you lose 12.5% of the water you poured
Which means the ratio you actually drink is 1 : 14, not 1 : 16. The gap is the liquid-retained ratio, exactly
18 g in 288 g of water is 62.5 g/kg, against the SCA Golden Cup figure of 55 — a stronger brew than the standard specifies
At a measured 1.35% TDS the brewing control chart would report an extraction of 18.9%, but the solids in the wet bed bring the mass balance to 21.6%

Every method on this page, and what its ratio is a ratio of

MethodRatio this page opens withWhat the ratio meansLiquid retained (g/g)Ratio in the cupCoffee per kg of water (g/kg)
Pour-over / filter cone1 : 16.00coffee → water in2.01 : 14.0062.5
Drip / batch brewer, at the SCA Golden Cup ratio1 : 18.18coffee → water in2.01 : 16.1855.0
French press / cafetiere1 : 13.00coffee → water in2.01 : 11.0076.9
Full immersion in a jug or cezve1 : 13.00coffee → water in3.01 : 10.0076.9
AeroPress1 : 14.00coffee → water in2.01 : 12.0071.4
Cold brew CONCENTRATE, to be diluted1 : 4.50coffee → water in3.01 : 1.50222.2
Cold brew, ready to drink1 : 12.00coffee → water in3.01 : 9.0083.3
Espresso — the ratio is dose to LIQUID OUT1 : 2.00dose → liquid out2.01 : 2.00250.0
Read the third column before the second. For every method but espresso the published ratio is dry coffee to water in, and the fourth column is then subtracted from it to give what you drink. For espresso the published ratio is dry dose to liquid out, so the water in is larger than the ratio suggests, not smaller: a 1:2 shot at an 18 g dose pushes about 72 g of water through the puck, which is 1:4. Mixing the two conventions up is the commonest error on this subject. The ratio column is the figure this page opens each method with, not a rule — the published bands are in the next table.

The two Golden Ratios do not agree, and the volumetric one cannot

If a US tablespoon of your grounds weighs…1 tbsp per 6 fl oz is2 tbsp per 6 fl oz is1 tbsp per 6 fl oz, in g/kg2 tbsp, in g/kg
3.0 g per US tbsp1 : 59.01 : 29.516.933.9
4.0 g per US tbsp1 : 44.31 : 22.122.645.2
5.0 g per US tbsp1 : 35.41 : 17.728.256.5
6.0 g per US tbsp1 : 29.51 : 14.833.967.7
The National Coffee Association’s drip page gives the Golden Ratio as “1 to 2 tablespoons of ground coffee for every 6 ounces of water”. Six US fluid ounces of water at 20 °C is 177.1 g, so the whole rule turns on what a tablespoon of grounds weighs — and Trade Coffee measured “4 grams per tablespoon … for medium roasts, and between 3 and 3.3 grams for dark roasts”, with a heaped spoon higher again. The rule therefore spans 1:15 to 1:59. SCA Standard 310-2021 instead specifies “55 g of coffee per 1.000 kg of fresh water”, which is 1:18.2 and has no spoon in it. Two published standards, and the volumetric one is a factor of four wide. That is the argument for the scale.

What the two standards bodies actually specify

QuantityFigureDocument
Drip brew ratio55 g of coffee per 1.000 kg of fresh water (1:18.18)SCA Standard 310-2021
Brew strength1.15-1.55% TDSSCA Standard 310-2021
Slurry temperature90-96 °CSCA Standard 310-2021
Extraction yield thought desirable18-22% of the dry dosewidely published; Wikipedia, Coffee extraction
Pour-over ratio1:13 to 1:16National Coffee Association
French press ratio1:10 to 1:16National Coffee Association
Cold brew ratio1:4 to 1:5 — a concentrate, to be dilutedNational Coffee Association
Bloomwater equal to double the dose, 30-45 sNational Coffee Association
Brew water temperature93 ± 3 °CNational Coffee Association
Liquid retained by the bedabout 2 mL/g drip, about 3 mL/g immersionBarista Hustle ACM 5.03
Certified Italian espresso7 ± 0.5 g of grounds, 25 ± 2.5 mL in the cup including crema, 9 ± 1 bar, 25 ± 5 sIstituto Nazionale Espresso Italiano
Note two things. First, the SCA ratio is stated per kilogram of water and its tolerance sits on the resulting strength, not on the ratio — the familiar “55 ± 10% g/L” is the older cupping figure and is not what 310-2021 says. Second, the Italian institute defines a certified espresso by the volume in the cup, crema included, where the modern specialty convention is a mass ratio of dose to liquid out. Those are different quantities measured with different instruments, and a 25 mL Italian espresso from a 7 g dose is not a 1:2 shot.

What this page will not do

Asked forWhy not
Grind size in microns from a grinder settingThere is nothing publishable here. A grinder’s numbered setting is a position on that model’s own burr adjustment, and two grinders at “18” have no relationship at all — not even a monotonic one once you compare a conical burr with a flat one. Published micron figures for “medium” or “fine” are particle-size distributions with long tails, not single numbers, and the fines fraction that drives extraction is not captured by the mode. Nothing here converts.
A brew timeTime is an outcome of the grind, the bed depth and the pour, not an input you can convert to. The published contact times in the table above are the ones their publishers state for their own methods, and they are there as context, not as a conversion.
Caffeine contentIt depends on the bean species, the roast, the dose and the extraction, and the figure people want is usually per cup rather than per gram. Nothing on this page measures it.
A water recipe (minerals, hardness, alkalinity)A real and important subject, and a different one. For the hardness units themselves see the water hardness converter.
The first refusal is the important one, because it is the thing most often asked for on pages like this. A grinder setting is not a physical quantity, so it cannot be converted into one.

Why 1:16 is not 16 parts of coffee

The ratio everybody quotes is not the ratio you drink. Publish a pour-over at 1:16 and you are describing dry coffee to water poured in. What comes out of the cone is that water minus whatever the soaked bed keeps, and the bed keeps a lot: Barista Hustle’s liquid-retained ratio is about 2 mL per gram of dry coffee for drip and a plunger, and about 3 for a full immersion in a jug or a cezve. So 18 g at 1:16 takes 288 g of water and gives 252 g of coffee — a drink at 1:14. Move the same recipe into a cafetière modelled as an immersion and you are at 1:13. The strength has not changed; the amount has, and that is why a recipe that fills a carafe in one brewer comes up short in another.

Espresso’s ratio is a different quantity with the same notation. A 1:2 shot means dry dose to liquid in the cup — 18 g in, 36 g out. To deliver those 36 g the machine has to push roughly 36 + 2 × 18 = 72 g of water through the puck, because the puck keeps about twice its own dry mass, so the water-in ratio is nearer 1:4. Quote a filter ratio as water in and an espresso ratio as liquid out and both are correct. Treat them as the same number and one of them is out by a factor of two, which is the single commonest error on this subject. It is worth knowing too that the Istituto Nazionale Espresso Italiano’s certified espresso is defined the old way, as 7 ± 0.5 g of grounds giving 25 ± 2.5 mL in the cup with the crema — a volume, measured in a glass, and not a 1:2 anything.

A volume of water is not a mass, and neither is a spoon of coffee. Water is 0.99821 g/mL cold from the tap and 0.95835 g/mL off the boil, so measuring a litre cold costs you 0.2% and measuring it boiling costs you 4.3% — a whole ratio point. Grounds are worse. The National Coffee Association’s own drip page gives the Golden Ratio volumetrically, as one to two tablespoons per six fluid ounces of water, and Trade Coffee measured a tablespoon of medium-roast grounds at 4 g and a dark roast at 3 to 3.3 g. Run those through the arithmetic and the same published rule spans about 1:15 to 1:59, while SCA Standard 310-2021 specifies 55 g of coffee per kilogram of water and nothing else. Two published standards for the same brew, and the one with a spoon in it is a factor of four wide.

Where the extraction number comes from, and what it leaves out. If you own a refractometer you measure strength — dissolved solids as a percentage of the beverage — and then compute extraction as strength × beverage mass ÷ dose. That is the brewing control chart, and it is a good instrument. But the beverage in it is only the liquid that reached the carafe: the liquid still in the wet bed is at the same concentration and carries dissolved solids that also came out of your dose. Put those back and at 1:16 with a retained ratio of 2 the extraction rises by about a seventh in relative terms. Both numbers are computed above. Neither is wrong; they measure different things, and the useful discipline is to pick one and use it every time.

What this page will not do. It will not convert a grinder setting into microns, because a grinder’s number is a position on that model’s own adjustment and two grinders on the same number are not making the same coffee — there is no conversion to build. It will not give you a brew time, which is an outcome rather than an input, and it will not estimate caffeine. For the kitchen arithmetic around it, see the cups to grams converter for ingredient densities, the US, UK and metric measures converter for the volume units themselves, and the recipe scaling calculator when you are making more of something.

Advertisement

Frequently asked questions

How much coffee for 500 mL of water?

At 1:16, 31.2 g — but read the question carefully, because 500 mL of water is 499.1 g at 20 °C, not 500, and 500 mL of coffee in the cup is a different question again. For 500 g of water at 1:16 you want 31.3 g of coffee and you will get about 437 g of drink, because the wet grounds keep the rest. Set this page to “I want this much coffee in the cup” if the 500 is what you want to drink.

Why doesn’t a 1:16 brew give me 16 parts of coffee?

Because the spent grounds keep some of the water. The liquid-retained ratio is about 2 g per gram of dry coffee for drip and a plunger and about 3 for a full immersion in a jug, so a 1:16 brew comes out at 1:14 in the cup and a 1:16 immersion at 1:13. The strength is unchanged — the same dissolved solids are in less liquid than you poured — but the amount is not, and that is why a recipe that works in a V60 comes up short in a cafetière.

Is espresso really 1:2?

Yes, and it means something different from every other ratio on this page. Espresso’s 1:2 is dry dose to liquid in the cup, so an 18 g dose gives 36 g of espresso — and to get that the machine has to push roughly 36 + 2 × 18 = 72 g of water through the puck, which is a water-in ratio of about 1:4. Quote a filter ratio as water in and an espresso ratio as liquid out and both are right; quote them as the same thing and one of them is out by a factor of two. Worth knowing as well: the Istituto Nazionale Espresso Italiano defines its certified espresso as 7 ± 0.5 g of grounds giving 25 ± 2.5 mL in the cup including crema — a volume, not a mass, and not a 1:2 shot.

What is the SCA Golden Cup ratio?

SCA Standard 310-2021 specifies the test brew as “55 g of coffee per 1.000 kg of fresh water”, which is 1:18.18. Two things about it are usually got wrong. It is stated per kilogram of water, not per litre of coffee, so there is no volume and no temperature in it. And 310-2021 puts its tolerance on the resulting strength — “a brew strength of 1.15-1.55%” — not on the ratio; the “55 ± 10% g/L” you often see is an older figure from a different document.

Do I need to weigh the water, or can I measure it?

You can measure it, as long as you know that a millilitre is not a gram. Cold from the tap water is 0.99821 g/mL, so a litre is 998.2 g and the shorthand is 0.2% high — irrelevant. Straight off the boil it is 0.95835 g/mL, so a litre of boiling water is 958 g and the shorthand is 4.3% high, which is a whole ratio point. Measure the jug cold, or weigh it.

Why does my refractometer say I am under-extracting when the coffee tastes fine?

Possibly because of the arithmetic rather than the coffee. The classic brewing control chart computes extraction as strength × beverage mass ÷ dose, and the beverage is only the liquid that reached the carafe. The liquid still in the wet bed is at the same concentration and carries dissolved solids too, and those came out of your dose. Put them back and the extraction rises — at 1:16 with a retained ratio of 2 the mass balance is about 14% higher relative than the chart figure. Both numbers are on this page; they are computed the same way every time, which is what matters for comparing one brew with the next.

What about grind size in microns?

This page refuses it, and the refusal is the honest answer. A grinder’s numbered setting is a position on that model’s own burr adjustment; two grinders on “18” are not making the same coffee and there is no conversion, not even a consistent ordering, between a conical burr and a flat one. Published micron figures for “medium” are particle-size distributions with long tails, and the fines that actually drive extraction are not described by the headline number. There is nothing here to convert.

Related calculators

References

  1. Specialty Coffee Association, SCA Standard 310-2021, Home Coffee Brewers (read 27 September 2026 from the copy hosted at coffeegeek.com), the current form of the Golden Cup standard and the anchor for the drip ratio here. It sets the test brew at “55 g of coffee per 1.000 kg of fresh water”, requires a brew strength of “1.15-1.55%”, and requires the slurry to “reach a temperature in the 90 to 96 °C range”. Note what it does and does not say: the ratio is stated per kilogram of water, not per litre of coffee, and 310-2021 puts its tolerance on the resulting STRENGTH, not on the ratio. The familiar “55 ± 10% g/L” is the older cupping figure and is not this document.
  2. National Coffee Association USA, brewing guides at aboutcoffee.org (read 27 September 2026), for the per-method ranges: pour-over “1 gram of coffee to 13-16 grams of water (1:13 to 1:16)”, French press “1:10 to 1:16”, cold brew “1:4 to 1:5”, water “93 ± 3 °C”, and a bloom of “water equal to double the coffee amount” for 30-45 s. Its drip page instead gives the volumetric Golden Ratio, “1 to 2 tablespoons of ground coffee for every 6 ounces of water”, which is a much weaker and much wider brew than 55 g/kg — see the table above, where both are computed.
  3. Barista Hustle, ACM 5.03 — Liquid Retained Ratios and the glossary entry liquid-retained ratio (read 27 September 2026): the ratio is “millilitres of brew liquid per gram of coffee”, and it is “approximately 3ml per gram of coffee” for immersion brewing (plunger, jug, cezve) against “around 2ml per gram” for drip. This is the single number that makes the yield come out right, and it is not one number.
  4. Blackout Coffee, My coffee is stealing my coffee: a few notes on absorption (read 27 September 2026), the same two figures from a second publisher, stated as “about 2x the dose” for press-style and “about 3x the dose” for a gravity-fed immersion carafe, with the worked example “20 g coffee holds about 40 g” and the honest caveat that these are “typical figures rather than fixed laws”.
  5. home-barista.com, A Note on Calculating Espresso Brew Ratios (read 27 September 2026), which states the trap this page is built around in one line: “we are using water in for brewing, and water out for espresso. Since the puck holds about twice its weight in water, this results in a large discrepancy.”
  6. Wikipedia, Espresso (read 27 September 2026), quoting the Istituto Nazionale Espresso Italiano’s certified-espresso parameters: “Necessary portion of ground coffee: 7 ± 0.5 g”, “Volume in cup (including crema): 25 ± 2.5 ml”, 9 ± 1 bar, 25 ± 5 s. The Italian definition is a volume in the cup; the modern specialty convention is a mass ratio. They are different quantities and this page prints both.
  7. Wikipedia, Coffee extraction (read 27 September 2026), for the extraction window “An extraction yield of 18% to 22% is desirable for most traditional coffee beverages” and the North American strength band “1.15% to 1.35%”.
  8. Trade Coffee, How to brew coffee without a scale (read 27 September 2026), the measured grams-per-tablespoon this page uses when a volume of grounds is entered: “4 grams per tablespoon pretty consistently within a few tenths of a gram for medium roasts, and between 3 and 3.3 grams for dark roasts”. The spread is why the volumetric route is shown with a warning and not as the default.
  9. Wikipedia, Properties of water (read 27 September 2026), quoting Tanaka et al. 2001 and the NIST Chemistry WebBook for VSMOW at 1 atm: 0.99984283 g/mL at 0 °C, 0.99704702 at 25 and 0.96188791 at 95. The Engineering ToolBox water-density table (read 27 September 2026) agrees to two decimals at every shared temperature and fills in the rest. The Tanaka closed form was re-evaluated here and reproduces the tabulated 0, 20 and 25 °C values to within 4 parts in 10 million.