Plasma Metanephrine Unit Converter

Plasma Metanephrine Unit Converter

Convert plasma free metanephrine between pg/mL, ng/L and pmol/L, and see why the sample must be drawn supine and off interfering drugs before it can be trusted.

Plasma Metanephrine converter

Mass ⇄ molar
pmol/L ÷ 5.070 ≈ pg/mL.
Ranges are laboratory-specific; confirm against your own report.
330pmol/LExample

Plasma free metanephrine 65 pg/mL, supine sample

Formula and conversion factor

pmol/L = pg/mL × 5.07022
pg/mL = pmol/L ÷ 5.07022
5.07022
derived from the molecular weight of metanephrine, 197.23 Da
ng/L
numerically identical to pg/mL
normetanephrine
a different molecule, 183.20 Da, with its own conversion factor — do not apply this factor to it

Worked example

Plasma free metanephrine 65 pg/mL, supine sample
65 × 5.07022 = 330 pmol/L
= 65 ng/L

Before the sample is drawn

RequirementReason
Supine, after 30 minutes’ restUpright posture raises catecholamine metabolites substantially and is a common cause of a false positive
Withhold tricyclic antidepressants and SNRIsBoth raise plasma metanephrines independently of any tumour
Withhold levodopa and sympathomimeticsRaise catecholamine metabolites through their own pathway
Check the assay for paracetamol interferenceInterferes with some chromatographic assays
Most raised results come from sampling conditions or medication rather than a tumour. Repeat supine and off interfering drugs before pursuing imaging.

Why metabolites, not catecholamines, are measured

Plasma free metanephrines are the most sensitive test available for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma, at close to 99%. The reason is mechanistic rather than simply a better assay: tumours metabolise catecholamines continuously inside the tumour cell, producing a steady output of metanephrine and normetanephrine, whereas catecholamine secretion itself is episodic and can be entirely normal between surges. Measuring the metabolites therefore outperforms measuring adrenaline or noradrenaline directly, which can miss a tumour sampled between episodes.

The trade-off is specificity, and false positives are common enough that sampling technique matters as much as the number itself. The sample should be drawn supine after at least 30 minutes’ rest, since upright posture raises the metabolites substantially through sympathetic activation. Interfering medication should be withheld where clinically possible: tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, levodopa, phenoxybenzamine and other sympathomimetics all raise the result, and paracetamol interferes with some chromatographic assays specifically.

Magnitude helps separate a genuine finding from noise. A result above three to four times the upper limit is close to diagnostic on its own. Smaller elevations are much more often explained by posture, stress or medication than by a tumour, and the sensible next step is to repeat the sample supine, after the required drug washout, before pursuing imaging.

Frequently asked questions

How do I convert plasma metanephrine to pmol/L?

Multiply the pg/mL (or ng/L, which is numerically identical) value by 5.070. A metanephrine of 65 pg/mL is 330 pmol/L.

Why are metanephrines measured rather than adrenaline itself?

Tumours metabolise catecholamines continuously inside the tumour cell, so metanephrine and normetanephrine are produced steadily. Catecholamine secretion is episodic and can be normal between surges, so measuring it directly can miss a tumour.

Why must the sample be drawn supine?

Upright posture raises plasma metanephrines substantially through sympathetic activation, and is one of the commonest causes of a false-positive result. Rest supine for at least 30 minutes before the draw.

Which drugs should be stopped before testing?

Tricyclic antidepressants, SNRIs, levodopa, phenoxybenzamine and other sympathomimetics where clinically feasible. Paracetamol interferes with some chromatographic assays specifically.

Related calculators

References

  1. Lenders JWM et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):1915–42.
  2. Eisenhofer G et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Clin Chem. 2003;49(10):1739–52.