Red Cell Indices Interpreter

Red Cell Indices Interpreter

Classify an anaemia from the MCV, MCHC and RDW, and see the differential each pattern opens up — and where the pattern stops and the confirmatory test has to start.

Red cell indices

MCV + MCHC → pattern
Mean corpuscular volume. Under 80 fL is microcytic, 80 to 100 normocytic, over 100 macrocytic. An MCV of exactly 80 or exactly 100 reads as normocytic here, which is how the interval is conventionally meant.
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration. Under 32 g/dL is hypochromic. If your report is in g/L, divide by 10 first — 320 g/L is 32 g/dL.
Optional. The RDW measures how variable the cell sizes are. It separates conditions that share an MCV: iron deficiency widens it, thalassaemia trait usually does not.
Microcytic hypochromic, RDW raisedExample

MCV 72 fL, MCHC 29.5 g/dL, RDW-CV raised above 14.5%

How the pattern is read

MCV <80 fL microcytic · 80–100 fL normocytic · >100 fL macrocytic
MCHC <32 g/dL hypochromic · 32–36 g/dL normochromic · >36 g/dL raised
RDW-CV >14.5% — cell size is variable
MCV
an average, and averages hide mixtures. A population of small cells and a population of large ones average to a normal MCV, which is why the RDW is read alongside it rather than after it
MCHC
haemoglobin per unit of packed cell volume. It is the most robust of the three indices and moves late, so hypochromia confirms a picture rather than detecting it early. A value above 36 g/dL is more often artefact than spherocytosis
RDW
the spread of cell sizes. It is what separates conditions sharing an MCV — iron deficiency widens it, thalassaemia trait usually does not — and it is often the first index to move
what this cannot do
name a cause. Iron deficiency and thalassaemia trait give the same microcytic hypochromic picture, which is precisely why the discriminant indices and then ferritin and electrophoresis exist

Worked example

MCV 72 fL, MCHC 29.5 g/dL, RDW-CV raised above 14.5%
MCV 72 fL is below 80 → microcytic
MCHC 29.5 g/dL is below 32 → hypochromic
RDW raised → the cells vary in size, which fits a supply that has failed progressively
→ iron deficiency heads this differential, and that is where the interpretation stops. Send ferritin, read against CRP
Change the RDW to normal and the same MCV and MCHC read differently: thalassaemia trait moves up the list, because a constitutional defect affects every cell equally. Neither answer is a diagnosis

The six combinations and what each opens up

MCVMCHCPatternUsual differentialNext test
<80<32Microcytic hypochromicIron deficiency, thalassaemia trait, anaemia of chronic disease, sideroblastic anaemia, leadFerritin with CRP; electrophoresis or HPLC if ferritin is normal
<8032–36Microcytic normochromicEarly iron deficiency, thalassaemia trait, anaemia of chronic diseaseFerritin with CRP; red cell count and the discriminant indices
80–10032–36Normocytic normochromicBlood loss, haemolysis, renal anaemia, anaemia of inflammation, marrow failure, endocrine diseaseReticulocyte count first — it splits underproduction from loss or destruction
80–100<32Normocytic hypochromicEarly iron deficiency, or a mixed deficiency averaging to a normal MCVFilm, RDW, ferritin and B12 together
>10032–36MacrocyticB12 or folate deficiency, alcohol, liver disease, hypothyroidism, myelodysplasia, drugs, reticulocytosisB12, folate, reticulocytes, TFTs, LFTs, drug chart, film
80–100>36Raised MCHCHereditary spherocytosis — but artefact is commoner: lipaemia, cold agglutinins, high white count, in vitro haemolysisFilm and a repeat sample before anything else
Every row is a differential, not a diagnosis. The classification narrows the list of tests worth sending; it never shortens it to one.

Why the RDW is read with the MCV, not after it

MCVRDWWhat that combination suggests
LowRaisedIron deficiency — a failing supply produces cells of progressively differing size
LowNormalThalassaemia trait — a constitutional defect affects every cell equally, so they are uniformly small
NormalRaisedA mixed or evolving picture the MCV alone would miss entirely — combined deficiency, partial treatment, recent transfusion
HighRaisedB12 or folate deficiency, brisk reticulocytosis, myelodysplasia
HighNormalAlcohol, liver disease, hypothyroidism, a marrow-suppressing drug — uniform effects across the population
The MCV is a mean and the RDW is its spread, so they answer different questions. A normal MCV with a wide RDW is the case for reading them together: the average is unremarkable and the population underneath it is not.

A classification that narrows the tests, and stops there

Classifying an anaemia by red cell indices is the oldest useful thing in haematology and it survives because it works: it turns an undifferentiated low haemoglobin into a short list of tests worth sending. Three numbers do the work. The MCV is the average volume of a red cell, and it splits anaemias into microcytic below 80 fL, normocytic between 80 and 100, and macrocytic above 100. The MCHC is the haemoglobin packed into that volume, and below about 32 g/dL the cells are hypochromic. The RDW is how much the cell sizes vary.

The MCV is a mean, and that is its weakness. A population of small cells mixed with a population of large ones averages to a perfectly normal MCV, so combined iron and B12 deficiency — a common combination in the elderly and after bariatric surgery — can hide behind a normocytic result. The RDW is what catches it: the mean is unremarkable and the spread is not. That is why the two are read together rather than in sequence, and why a normal MCV with a wide RDW is worth a film and a full set of haematinics rather than reassurance.

The MCHC behaves differently from the other two. It is the most robust of the indices and the last to move, so hypochromia confirms a picture that is already established rather than detecting an early one. In the other direction it is chiefly useful as an error detector: a value above about 36 g/dL is more often lipaemia, cold agglutinins, a very high white cell count or in vitro haemolysis than it is hereditary spherocytosis, and the right response is a look at the film and a fresh sample.

What none of this does is make a diagnosis, and the microcytic hypochromic pattern is the clearest demonstration of why. Iron deficiency and beta-thalassaemia trait produce the same three indices, and they need opposite responses — one is treated with iron and an investigation for the source of loss, the other is a lifelong carrier state with implications for the patient's relatives and for any pregnancy. The discriminant indices exist for exactly this ambiguity, and they only prioritise who is sent for electrophoresis. Ferritin, read against CRP, and haemoglobin electrophoresis or HPLC are what settle it. The pattern tells you which tests to send; it does not tell you what the patient has.

Frequently asked questions

What do MCV and MCHC together tell you?

They classify the anaemia rather than diagnose it. The MCV splits it into microcytic, normocytic or macrocytic, and the MCHC says whether the cells are hypochromic. Each combination has a characteristic differential and a characteristic next test, but several different diseases share each pattern.

Is an MCV of exactly 80 fL microcytic?

No — 80 to 100 fL is conventionally an inclusive interval, so an MCV of exactly 80.0 or exactly 100.0 reads as normocytic, and that is how this page classifies it. A result sitting on the boundary should be read with the RDW, the previous result and the clinical picture rather than on the number alone.

Can the MCV be normal in a patient with two deficiencies?

Yes, and it commonly is. The MCV is an average, so small iron-deficient cells and large B12-deficient cells average to a normal figure. The RDW usually gives it away by being wide, and the blood film shows two distinct populations, which is why both are worth asking for.

Does a microcytic hypochromic picture mean iron deficiency?

No. Iron deficiency is the commonest cause, but thalassaemia trait, anaemia of chronic disease, sideroblastic anaemia and lead exposure all produce it, and iron deficiency and thalassaemia trait frequently coexist. Ferritin read against CRP, and haemoglobin electrophoresis if ferritin is normal, are what separate them.

What does a high MCHC mean?

Usually an artefact. Lipaemia, cold agglutinins, a very high white cell count, in vitro haemolysis and an underfilled tube all raise it spuriously, and those are commoner than the real cause, hereditary spherocytosis. Look at the film and repeat on a fresh sample before investigating a membrane disorder.

Related calculators

References

  1. Tefferi A, Hanson CA, Inwards DJ. How to interpret and pursue an abnormal complete blood cell count in adults. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(7):923–936.
  2. Bain BJ. Blood Cells: A Practical Guide. 5th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
  3. Hoffbrand AV, Steensma DP. Hoffbrand's Essential Haematology. 8th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2019 — hypochromic and macrocytic anaemias.

Medical Disclaimer: The tools and content provided here are for educational and reference purposes only. They are not intended to substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Clinical decisions should always be based on the comprehensive assessment of a qualified healthcare professional.