ROMA Index Calculator (Ovarian Malignancy Risk)

ROMA Index Calculator (Ovarian Malignancy Risk)

Combine HE4, CA 125 and menopausal status into a single risk estimate that guides referral for an adnexal mass.

ROMA Index (Ovarian Malignancy Risk)

Two-marker logistic index
29.2% ROMAExample

HE4 70 pmol/L, CA 125 45 U/mL, postmenopausal

Formula

PI (premenopausal) = −12.0 + 2.38·ln(HE4) + 0.0626·ln(CA125)
PI (postmenopausal) = −8.09 + 1.04·ln(HE4) + 0.732·ln(CA125)
ROMA (%) = e^PI ÷ (1 + e^PI) × 100
HE4
human epididymis protein 4, pmol/L
CA125
cancer antigen 125, U/mL
PI
predictive index — the logistic combination of the two markers, with different coefficients by menopausal status

Worked example

HE4 70 pmol/L, CA 125 45 U/mL, postmenopausal
PI = −8.09 + 1.04 × ln(70) + 0.732 × ln(45) = −8.09 + 4.418 + 2.786 = −0.885
ROMA = e^−0.885 ÷ (1 + e^−0.885) × 100 = 0.413 ÷ 1.413 × 100 = 29.2% ROMA
Just below the 29.9% postmenopausal high-risk cut-off

ROMA cut-offs by menopausal status

StatusHigh-risk cut-off
Premenopausal≥ 11.4%
Postmenopausal≥ 29.9%
The band shown on this page uses the postmenopausal threshold; a premenopausal result must be read against 11.4%, not 29.9%.

What else raises CA 125

ConditionEffect on CA 125
EndometriosisRaised, independent of malignancy
Uterine fibroidsRaised
Pregnancy, menstruationRaised
Pelvic inflammatory diseaseRaised
Cirrhosis, heart failureRaised via peritoneal or pleural irritation
This is precisely why HE4 was added to CA 125: HE4 is far less affected by benign gynaecological and inflammatory conditions.

What ROMA adds to CA 125 alone

ROMA combines HE4 and CA 125 with menopausal status to stratify a woman with an adnexal mass into low or high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, and the result is used to guide referral to a gynaecological oncologist rather than to a general gynaecologist — a referral pathway shown to improve surgical outcomes.

The cut-offs differ by menopausal status — commonly 11.4% premenopausal and 29.9% postmenopausal — because baseline HE4 and CA 125 both shift with menopause. The band shown here uses the postmenopausal threshold; a premenopausal result must be read against 11.4%, not against this page’s default band, and using the wrong cut-off will misclassify a meaningful proportion of women.

CA 125 alone is raised by endometriosis, uterine fibroids, pregnancy, menstruation, pelvic inflammatory disease, cirrhosis and heart failure — conditions with nothing to do with malignancy — which is precisely why HE4 was added to the index. HE4 is much less affected by these benign gynaecological and inflammatory conditions, so combining the two markers cancels out a substantial source of false-positive risk that CA 125 alone would generate.

ROMA does not diagnose cancer and does not replace imaging or histology. It is a triage tool: a high result increases the probability that surgery should happen at a specialist centre, and a low result does not exclude malignancy outright.

Frequently asked questions

What does the ROMA index measure?

It combines HE4, CA 125 and menopausal status into a single percentage risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a woman with an adnexal mass, used to guide referral to a gynaecological oncologist.

What ROMA cut-off should I use?

11.4% for premenopausal women and 29.9% for postmenopausal women. Using the postmenopausal cut-off on a premenopausal result will misclassify risk.

Why is HE4 combined with CA 125 rather than used alone?

CA 125 is raised by many benign conditions — endometriosis, fibroids, pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease, cirrhosis and heart failure. HE4 is far less affected by these, so combining the two reduces false positives.

Does a low ROMA score rule out ovarian cancer?

No. ROMA is a triage tool that stratifies risk to guide referral; it does not replace imaging or histological diagnosis, and a low score does not exclude malignancy.

Related calculators

References

  1. Moore RG et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(1):40–46.
  2. Moore RG et al. Utility of a novel serum tumor biomarker HE4 in patients with a pelvic mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(3):351.e1–351.e11.