Growth Hormone Unit Converter

Growth Hormone Unit Converter

Convert growth hormone between ng/mL, µg/L, mIU/L and µIU/mL using the WHO standard of 3.0 IU per mg — and see why that factor was different before 2001, and why a single random GH answers almost nothing.

Growth Hormone converter

Mass ⇄ international units
ng/mL and µg/L are the same number. mIU/L and µIU/mL are the same as each other, and 3× larger — provided the report was calibrated against the current WHO standard.
0.80ng/mLExample

Growth hormone 0.8 ng/mL

The four units, and the standard behind the factor of 3

ng/mL = µg/L
mIU/L = µIU/mL
mIU/L = ng/mL × 3.0
because 1 mg of somatropin = 3.0 IU (WHO International Standard 98/574)
ng/mL = µg/L
a nanogram per millilitre and a microgram per litre are the same concentration. Laboratories in the United Kingdom and much of Europe report µg/L; North American reports usually say ng/mL, and the number does not change
mIU/L = µIU/mL
also identical to each other. A milli-international-unit per litre is a micro-international-unit per millilitre, for the same reason that ng/mL equals µg/L
×3.0, from a potency assignment
the current WHO International Standard for somatropin, 98/574, is assigned 3.0 International Units per milligram. One microgram per litre therefore carries 3.0 milli-international-units per litre. This is a calibration agreed by collaborative study, not a property of the molecule
why there is no nmol/L
the International Unit measures biological potency against a reference preparation, not an amount of substance. Growth hormone circulates as a mixture of the 22 kDa and 20 kDa isoforms and of monomer, dimer and binding-protein-bound forms, so no single molar mass describes what an assay reports. This site carries no molar unit for growth hormone for that reason
the factor used to be 2.6
the older International Standard, 80/505, was extracted from human pituitary glands and assigned 4.4 IU per ampoule containing about 1.70 mg of hormone — about 2.59 IU per milligram. A result converted with the old factor and one converted with the new differ by roughly 14%, which is why mIU/L figures in older papers and older reports are not directly comparable with today's

Worked example

Growth hormone 0.8 ng/mL
0.8 ng/mL = 0.80 µg/L — the same number in the other mass convention
0.8 × 3.0 = 2.40 mIU/L = 2.40 µIU/mL, using the current WHO standard 98/574
Converted against the superseded pituitary standard at 2.59 IU/mg, the same sample would have been reported as about 2.07 mIU/L — the same blood, a different number
Going the other way, a historical result of 2.40 mIU/L on the old standard corresponds to 2.40 ÷ 2.59 = 0.93 ng/mL, not 0.80
What none of this tells you is whether 0.8 ng/mL is high or low. Growth hormone is secreted in pulses; a value drawn at random can be near zero in a healthy adult and several µg/L half an hour later in the same person

The two international standards, and the gap between them

StandardMaterialAssigned potency1 ng/mL converts to
WHO IS 98/574 — currentRecombinant somatropin3.0 IU per mg (1.95 mg per ampoule)3.0 mIU/L
WHO IS 80/505 — supersededExtracted from human pituitary glands4.4 IU per ampoule, containing about 1.70 mgabout 2.6 mIU/L
DifferenceAbout 14% lower on the old standard2.6 against 3.0
This is the single most useful thing on the page. A growth hormone in mIU/L cannot be compared across the changeover without knowing which standard the reporting laboratory used, and the difference is large enough to move a result across a decision threshold. Where the standard is not stated, mass units — ng/mL or µg/L — are the safer currency, because they do not depend on it.

Why a random growth hormone is close to uninterpretable

Question being askedWhat is actually measuredThe role of a random GH
Is there acromegaly?IGF-1 first; then failure of GH to suppress below 1 µg/L during an oral glucose tolerance testThe Endocrine Society guideline recommends against relying on random GH to make this diagnosis
Is there growth hormone deficiency in an adult?Peak GH during a stimulation test — insulin tolerance, glucagon or macimorelinA low random value is expected in health and proves nothing
Is a child growing poorly because of GH deficiency?Auxology and growth velocity first, then stimulation testing, with IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 as supporting measuresNot used
Is treated acromegaly in remission?Age-matched IGF-1, with GH as a secondary measureInterpreted only alongside IGF-1
Growth hormone is released in bursts, mostly at night, with long troughs between them. Exercise, fasting, sleep, stress and oestrogen all move it. That is why every serious question about the GH axis is answered by a dynamic test or by IGF-1, which integrates GH exposure over days, rather than by a single blood level.

A factor that changed, and a hormone that pulses

Growth hormone is reported two ways. Mass units — nanograms per millilitre, or the identical micrograms per litre — say how much protein is in the sample. International units say how much biological potency it has when measured against a WHO reference preparation. The bridge between them is a potency assignment rather than a molecular weight: the current International Standard for somatropin, 98/574, carries 3.0 International Units per milligram, so one microgram per litre is three milli-international-units per litre, and one mIU/L is one µIU/mL.

The factor has not always been three. Before recombinant somatropin became the reference material, the standard was 80/505, prepared from human pituitary glands and assigned 4.4 International Units per ampoule for an ampoule containing roughly 1.70 milligrams of hormone — about 2.6 units per milligram. A laboratory using the old standard therefore reported about 14% fewer milli-units for the same concentration of hormone, and a mIU/L figure quoted in an older paper back-converts to a mass concentration about 15% higher than the same figure would today. Where an old result is being compared with a new one, or a threshold is carried across from older literature, the mass units are the safer currency because they do not depend on which ampoule the assay was calibrated against.

There is no molar conversion on this page, and that is not an omission. The International Unit measures what the hormone does, not how many molecules are present, and circulating growth hormone is not one molecule: the 22-kilodalton form predominates but a 20-kilodalton variant, oligomers and a large binding-protein-bound fraction all circulate alongside it, and assays see them differently. A single molar mass would misdescribe all of that, so no nmol/L figure is offered.

The larger point is that the number being converted rarely answers the question that prompted the test. Growth hormone is secreted in pulses, predominantly during slow-wave sleep, with long intervals in between during which a healthy adult’s level is close to undetectable. A random measurement therefore has an enormous healthy range and almost no discriminating power. Acromegaly is confirmed by failure of growth hormone to suppress below 1 µg/L during an oral glucose load, after IGF-1 has raised the suspicion; deficiency is established by the peak response to a stimulation test, not by a baseline value. IGF-1, which reflects growth hormone exposure integrated over days and does not pulse, is the better screening measurement in both directions. This page will convert your units accurately. It cannot make a random growth hormone mean more than it does.

Frequently asked questions

How do you convert growth hormone from ng/mL to mIU/L?

Multiply by 3. The WHO International Standard for somatropin, 98/574, is assigned 3.0 International Units per milligram, so 1 ng/mL — which is the same as 1 µg/L — equals 3.0 mIU/L, and mIU/L and µIU/mL are the same number. A growth hormone of 0.8 ng/mL is 2.40 mIU/L.

Why do some sources say 1 ng/mL is 2.6 mIU/L?

Because they predate the current standard. The older International Standard 80/505 was extracted from human pituitary glands and worked out at about 2.59 IU per milligram, against 3.0 IU per milligram for the recombinant material that replaced it. Results in mIU/L from before the changeover are about 14% lower than the same concentration would give today, so old and new figures in international units are not directly comparable.

Why is there no nmol/L conversion for growth hormone?

Because the International Unit is a measure of biological potency against a reference preparation, not an amount of substance, and circulating growth hormone is a mixture of isoforms, oligomers and binding-protein-bound hormone rather than a single species with one molecular weight. Any single molar figure would misdescribe what the assay actually reports.

What is a normal growth hormone level?

There is no useful single answer, which is why this page prints no reference interval. Secretion is pulsatile and mostly nocturnal, so a healthy adult’s level swings from near-undetectable to several µg/L within an hour. Acromegaly is diagnosed by failure to suppress below 1 µg/L during an oral glucose load and deficiency by the peak response to a stimulation test — not by a random level.

Should I use growth hormone or IGF-1 to screen for a growth hormone problem?

IGF-1, in almost every case. It is produced in response to growth hormone and has a long half-life, so it reflects average exposure over days rather than the moment the needle went in. The Endocrine Society acromegaly guideline recommends measuring IGF-1 in suspected cases and recommends against relying on random growth hormone levels to make the diagnosis.

Related calculators

References

  1. Katznelson L, Laws ER, Melmed S, et al. Acromegaly: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):3933–3951.
  2. National Institute for Biological Standards and Control. WHO International Standard: Somatropin, 98/574 — Instructions for Use. Assigned potency 3.0 IU per mg somatropin.
  3. National Institute for Biological Standards and Control. WHO International Standard: Growth Hormone, Human, Pituitary, 80/505 — Instructions for Use. 4.4 IU per ampoule, approximately 1.70 mg hGH.
  4. Giustina A, Biermasz N, Casanueva FF, et al. Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission. Pituitary. 2024. doi:10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1.

Medical Disclaimer: The tools and content provided here are for educational and reference purposes only. They are not intended to substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Clinical decisions should always be based on the comprehensive assessment of a qualified healthcare professional.